How movement poverty silently destroys your health
We live in an era when we have access to more health information than ever before. We know what we should eat, how long we should sleep, why stress is harmful. And yet more and more people are moving less than their grandparents, who had no idea what the term "lifestyle" even meant. Experts are beginning to use a new term for this phenomenon – movement poverty – and what lies behind it is more troubling than it might appear at first glance.
Movement poverty is not just another word for laziness or lack of willpower. It is a systematic, societal problem that emerged as a by-product of the modern way of life. Office jobs, online shopping, streaming platforms, food delivery to your door – each of these conveniences moves us one step further from the natural movement that was part of everyday human life for thousands of years. And while a sedentary lifestyle was until recently seen as more of a personal choice, science today identifies it as one of the most significant risk factors for a wide range of chronic diseases.
Try our natural products
What exactly does movement poverty mean?
The term "movement poverty" began to enter the specialist literature as a response to the need to name something that mere "sedentary behaviour" does not adequately capture. While a sedentary lifestyle describes what we do (we sit), movement poverty describes what we lack – namely the natural, varied and continuous movement that our bodies need to function properly. It is not simply a matter of whether someone goes to the gym. Movement poverty can affect even a person who exercises three times a week but spends the rest of the day motionless in front of a computer.
Kiro Kiriakidis, an expert in movement sciences, put it succinctly: "An hour of exercise cannot compensate for eight hours of sitting." This insight fundamentally changes the way we should think about movement – not as a block scheduled in a diary, but as a continuous, natural rhythm that permeates the entire day.
Research repeatedly shows that prolonged sitting is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, as well as depression and anxiety. The World Health Organization estimates that physical inactivity is the fourth largest risk factor for global mortality – just behind high blood pressure, smoking and high blood sugar. And yet movement poverty as a public health problem is still talked about far too little.
Consider Martina, a thirty-three-year-old project manager from Prague. Every day she gets up, moves from her bed to her computer, goes through six to eight hours of video calls, occasionally walks to the kitchen for coffee, and collapses on the sofa in the evening. The step counter on her phone shows an average of 2,800 steps per day – roughly a third of the recommended minimum. Martina does not consider herself lazy. She works hard, is productive, and looks after her family. And yet her body goes through what experts describe as movement poverty every single day. Her story is not an exception – it is an increasingly typical portrait of modern man.
Why is movement poverty so insidious?
The insidiousness of movement poverty lies in the fact that it does not manifest itself immediately. Unlike an acute injury or illness, its consequences come slowly and imperceptibly. The back starts to stiffen, energy levels drop, sleep deteriorates, mood fluctuates. These symptoms are so common that most people attribute them to stress, ageing or bad weather – not to a lack of movement.
The human body is evolutionarily programmed for movement. For hundreds of thousands of years, our ancestors walked, ran, climbed, carried, bent and stretched as part of everyday survival. Our musculoskeletal system, as well as our cardiovascular and nervous systems, are literally built to be in continuous, moderate movement. When this movement is absent, the body begins to react – initially gently, then increasingly noticeably. Muscles weaken, joints stiffen, metabolism slows, and the brain receives less oxygenated blood.
Interestingly, movement poverty does not only affect people in office-based professions. Paradoxically, it is increasingly spreading among young people, who should theoretically be the most vital segment of the population. A study published in JAMA Cardiology showed that the physical fitness of young adults aged 18–30 is declining faster than would correspond to natural ageing – and researchers identified a sedentary lifestyle combined with a lack of continuous movement throughout the day as the primary cause.
Technology also plays a part in this trend. Smartphones, tablets and smart televisions are designed to keep us in one place for as long as possible. Social media algorithms reward passive scrolling. Gaming platforms offer worlds in which one can immerse oneself for hours without a single physical movement. This is not a conspiracy – it is simply a business model whose by-product is our physical immobility. In this context, movement poverty is largely a problem of the design of the environment in which we live, not merely a matter of individual failure.
How can movement poverty be countered in everyday life?
The good news is that movement poverty is not an inevitable fate. Unlike many other health risks, it can be addressed without expensive medication, special equipment or radical lifestyle changes. The key is understanding that movement does not need to be intense to be effective – it primarily needs to be regular and continuous.
Research shows that short movement breaks every thirty to sixty minutes can significantly reduce the negative effects of prolonged sitting. Simply standing up and sitting back down again is not enough, however – the body needs at least a brief moment of genuine movement: stretching, a few steps, a squat, trunk rotation. So-called "micro-movement moments" may seem negligible at first glance, but their cumulative effect is scientifically proven. A study from the University of Colorado, for example, found that just five minutes of walking every hour reduces blood sugar levels after meals more significantly than a single thirty-minute walk at the end of the day.
In addition to consciously incorporating movement into the working day, the environment in which we live and work also plays an important role. A standing desk, walking during phone calls, stairs instead of the lift, walking to lunch – these are all small architectural and habitual changes that can significantly increase overall daily movement. The Danes and the Dutch, who are among the most active nations in Europe, do not stand out necessarily because of their enthusiasm for sport, but because their cities and culture are set up so that movement is a natural part of the day – bicycles as the primary means of transport, pedestrian zones, shorter distances.
An important part of combating movement poverty is also the choice of products and accessories that support movement or at least do not hinder it. Ergonomic workplace equipment, quality footwear for everyday walking, natural materials in clothing that do not pinch or restrict movement – all of this helps to make movement pleasant, and therefore sustainable. As with healthy eating or an ecological approach to life, the principle holds that sustainable change does not arise from the willpower to endure, but from creating conditions in which the right choice is the most comfortable one.
Activities in nature also play an interesting role. Walks in the forest, gardening, cycling trips – these seemingly simple activities combine movement with other proven benefits for mental health. Research published in the journal Nature confirmed that people who spend at least two hours a week in nature report significantly better subjective health and wellbeing than those who remain predominantly indoors. Nature thus acts as a double remedy – for movement poverty and for the chronic stress that so often accompanies it.
Movement poverty also affects children, in a way that can have long-term consequences. Children who spend a large part of the day in front of screens and little time in free outdoor play do not develop the natural movement patterns that form the foundation of a healthy musculoskeletal system in adulthood. The World Health Organization recommends that children aged 5–17 have at least 60 minutes of moderately intense physical activity per day – the reality in many developed countries is significantly below this threshold.
Ultimately, movement poverty is also a matter of cultural attitude towards the body and movement. In many societies, movement is still perceived as a tool for achieving a certain appearance or performance – we lose weight to look better, we run to improve our time. This approach instrumentalises movement and strips it of its natural joy. An alternative perspective, advocated for example by Scandinavian concepts such as the Norwegian friluftsliv (loosely translated: life in the open air), views movement as a value in itself – as a way of being in the world, not as a means to another end.
Movement poverty is therefore far more than a fashionable term. It is a mirror that the modern age holds up to us, and the image reflected in it is not particularly flattering. But unlike many other problems of our time, it is a problem that each of us can begin to do something about today – perhaps by getting up from the desk, opening the window and taking a few steps. The body remembers. And gradually it will start to ask for more.
